Sponsored Links


Sponsored Links

Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Critical thinking about science and jihadism” was written by Letters, for The Guardian on Monday 7th December 2015 19.38 UTC

Sponsored Links

The notion that scientists are easy prey to jihadism is scurrilous because of the false assertion that scientific education is uncritical (Paul Vallely, Opinion, 4 December). Putting aside the issue of whether 18 British Muslims make up a reliable sample, it can be hypothesised that it is more likely that jihadism might be a reaction against the critical scientific approach that denies the veracity of many of the events in the religious texts. What is equally disturbing is that Martin Rose of the British Council fails to understand that science is the very essence of British culture – a culture that has produced, or encouraged, scientists and philosophers of science such as Roger Bacon, Francis Bacon, Newton, Hooke, Boyle, Wallace, Darwin, Rutherford, Crick, Popper and Sanger (to name just a few). Our success in this area comes about because British scientists are critical and question authority.
Professor Bernard John Moxham
Cardiff

Sponsored Links

• In the 12th century, Islam, Christianity and Judaism coexisted peacefully in the Spanish city of Cordoba, where, in the museum celebrating this fact, the Muslim philosopher Averroes (Ibn Rushd) is quoted as telling his pupils the most frequently repeated teaching of the Qu’ran is “to make the effort to think things out for yourselves”. Wise words to counter the UN report that “Arab education curriculums seem to encourage submission, obedience, subordination and compliance, rather than free critical thinking”, and to back up Paul Vallely’s conclusion that students “require input … to open up to them the richness of Islamic traditions that constituted the religion before the arrival of oil-rich Salafi fundamentalism”. This would seem to be an urgent issue for Muslim educators to address.
Marjorie Drake
Preston

Sponsored Links

• I must protest at the preposterous assertion that there is an “engineering mindset” that is unwilling to argue with authority. Engineering and science exist to discover how the world works even if the results upset the establishment. If they hadn’t argued with “authority” we would still believe that Earth was specifically created for the benefit of man 6,000 years ago, and that it is at the centre of the universe.
John Ashwell
Eastleigh, Hampshire

• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links


Godwin Wilson


Godwin is a professional web/app  developer, SEO Analyst, Blogger, Google Local Guide and admin of truefinder affiliated websites. Godwin enjoys sharing his knowledge and learning more about digital platforms with clients and other enthusiasts. He loves to see his clients succeed both on and offline.

Support meSupport me

You may also like...